Liberty & National Security

In the wake of the September 11th attack, the American government moved aggressively to protect the United States from future acts of terror. But the government has too often claimed to promote national security to the point that these measures encroached on civil liberties of U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens alike.  However, an effective national security policy that truly counters terrorism does not need to limit the rights recognized by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. 

Through the Liberty and National Security Project, we fight to preserve our constitutional values against erosion in the post-9/11 world and to set meaningful limits on the exercise of executive power. We develop innovative policy recommendations, and then use litigation and public advocacy to ensure that our nation’s commitment to our national security does not trump the nation’s commitment to fairness, accountability, and due process. These ideals remain fundamental to and compatible with effective security measures. 

 

Rev. Boyle v. Werner, et al.

Rev. Boyle believes he was unfairly targeted by the U.S. for his religious convictions and stance against the war. Both are violations of his First Amendment rights and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Geren v. Omar and Munaf v. Geren

The Brennan Center represents two United States citizens, Shawqi Omar and Mohammad Munaf, who have been detained by the United States in Iraq for more than two years, and whose cases will be heard in the Supreme Court in March 2008.  On June 12, 2008, the Supreme Court issued its decision in this case.

Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri

The Center is defending a Qatari national detained as an “enemy combatant” in the United States. Mr. Al-Marri has been imprisoned without trial and without due process. The case was heard en banc in the Fourth District Court on October 31, 2007, and we are awaiting the decision. A separate, ongoing case is challenging Mr. al-Marri’s conditions of confinement.

More Court Cases

Thaddeus Kromelis

Lessig, MAPLight & the Telecoms

Yesterday, I managed to catch Larry Lessig’s latest “Change Congress” Power Point presentation at the Personal Democracy Forum (PDF) here in New York City....

Emily Berman

On the Bolten-Miers Hearing

The issues were preliminary and the result of any ruling likely to be. But despite its preliminary nature, a simple Monday morning hearing in the D.C. District Court had the feeling of something much more....

R. Patrick Wyllie

Kennedy: “Liberty and Security Can Be Reconciled”

Today, the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. Bush was a clear rebuke of the Administration’s attempt to deny Guantanamo detainees’ basic rights....

More Blog Entries

Illustrations by Risko

BC Responds: Boumediene & Omar and Munaf Decisions

Today, in two cases, the Supreme Court affirmed the paramount importance of habeas corpus as a cornerstone of the rule of law.

Groups Across the Spectrum Join Forces in Defense of Separation of Powers

Attorneys at the Brennan Center filed a brief asking the District Court of Washington DC to allow Congress to proceed with its efforts to enforce the subpoenas issued against White House staffers Joshua Bolten and Harriet Miers.

U.S. Government Admits It Destroyed Videotape in Enemy Combatant Case

Yesterday the U.S. government admitted, for the first time, that officials destroyed videotapes that documented interrogations of Ali Almarri, the only alleged “enemy combatant” still detained on U. S. soil.

More Press Releases

Memo to House Intelligence Committee on Telecom Immunity

Emily Berman addresses the issues with granting immunity to telecommunications carriers and proposes alternatives to awarding them complete amnesty.

Memo Regarding Concerns with NYPD August 2007 Report on “Radicalization in the West”

Aziz Huq raises the concern that the New York Police Department’s August 2007 report draws conclusions unwarranted by its insufficient data set.  The memo suggests that this problematic methodology will likely result in racial and religious profiling.

Hearing Testimony on Habeas Corpus and Detentions

Jonathan Hafetz explains why restoring habeas is essential to regaining the legitimacy and moral credibility necessary to build an effective counter-terrorism policy.

More Legislation & Testimony

Justice Scalia’s Dueling Opinions

Scalia’s opinion in the ruling overturning D.C.’s gun ban shows the flaws of his trademark judicial thinking. Especially since he marshaled nearly the reverse logic in his dissent to the Guantanamo detainee case.

Emily Berman on the Firing of US Attorneys

Emily Berman on KUOW’s “The Conversation” discussing the firing of nine US attorneys and executive privilege.

Surveillance Bill: The Worst of All Worlds

Analysis of the just-passed “FISA Amendments Act of 2008” on The Nation’s web site.

More Analysis & Commentary