Skip Navigation
Court Case Tracker

Merklin v. Largent

Two Oklahoma voters are challenging the ballot language of a citizen initiative to create an independent redistricting commission in the state.

Last Updated: May 27, 2020
Published: March 16, 2020

Note: The Brennan Center is not a participant in this case.

Case Background

On February 28, 2020, two Oklahoma voters filed a petition with the Oklahoma Supreme Court to challenge the sufficiency of the gist of Initiative Petition 426, a proposed constitutional amendment that would create an independent redistricting commission to draw congressional and state legislative maps. The redistricting reform initiative’s gist was revised after being struck down by the state supreme court in Newberry v. Moore.

Plaintiffs in this case argue that the revised gist inaccurately and insufficiently describes the commission’s selection panel, voting requirements, and political fairness map-drawing criterion. As a result, the plaintiffs are asking the court to declare the gist of Initiative Petition 426 legally deficient.

Oral argument took place via telephone on March 17, 2020. On May 27, 2020, the court ruled that the gist of Initiative Petition 426 is legally sufficient.

Documents

Oklahoma Supreme Court