Skip Navigation
Resource

Arizona: Protections Against Intimidation of Voters and Election Workers

This resource details state and federal laws protecting against the intimidation of voters and election workers and the disruption of the voting process.

Last Updated: October 25, 2024
Published: October 28, 2022
View the entire Laws Protecting Voters and Election Workers from Intimidation series

Voters in Arizona have the right to vote free from intimidation under federal and state law.footnote1_xQSXiYZ-53ggvr9whol15-qb0IXq1UAs1p-qC4hAeA_rKOzKVubOsm71See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 594; 52 U.S.C. § 10101(b); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16–1013.Federal law broadly prohibits intimidation, threats, or coercion throughout every stage of the election process;footnote1_QY2dUiYlF4pPLu3rzJo7Dn6zjiQ5N6UWuUWFNXebnLM_uSkRrTIS3bhT1See U.S. Department of Justice, Voting Rights Fact Sheet (Sept. 2024), https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1366636/dl (summarizing federal laws that protect against intimidation).more information on the federal protections that apply to all states can be found here. In addition, the following actions are specifically prohibited by Arizona law:

The below addresses the laws that serve as guardrails against specific threats of intimidation.

Voter Challenges

Although Arizona law permits any properly registered voter to challenge another voter’s eligibility,footnote6_Z41GVVdoFiPkkDXKp6tAw3P7xifNWRaFDAG1RcfBuc_kzY4y9vtgkKV6 Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16–591.state law also provides for some guardrails:

  • Arizona law requires that a challenger must show that a voter is not eligible by clear and convincing evidence.footnote7_WcTGw9DHwd6wVISTXtakLsfBzMQ3RIDNt5mV0oWCko_jp1SF3T292fJ7Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, December 30, 2023, 194, http://apps.azsos.gov/election/files/epm/2023/EPM_20231231_Final_Edits_to_Cal_1_11_2024.pdf.
  • Challenges at a polling place must be made only to poll workers. No challenger may confront or question a voter directly.
  • Any challenges based at all on race, national origin, disability, language, or religion may constitute voter intimidation.footnote8_8s0-cyCxfAEq9rxG4816tEyrMRwYC1jABJcox9qdbVE_gCkY59rZaUjJ8Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, 182–83.
  • Repeated frivolous challenges, or those that are made to harass and intimidate voters, may amount to prohibited voter intimidation, and the challenger may be removed from the polling place.footnote9_8s0-cyCxfAEq9rxG4816tEyrMRwYC1jABJcox9qdbVE_j1OaCnpkKtyJ9Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, 182–83.

Arizona law requires a high burden of proof for challenges to be sustained:

The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) provides additional safeguards to protect voters from mass challenges before an election:

The Brennan Center and All Voting Is Local published a detailed resource on the limits on voter eligibility challenges in Arizona here.

Intimidation of Poll Workers and Election Officials

In addition to federal protections against the intimidation of election workers, interfering with the work of an election worker in any manner is a felony in Arizona.footnote16_cclH1PmUhjOVrjrdScpf2nnbx0ar7m15fV0ttLkwksY_iPpIPwqnTWyM16Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16–1004(A).It is also a misdemeanor to use or threaten to use violence or physical force to obstruct any public servant in performing a governmental function.footnote17_43Sb3a7P6E-hA1mWHuOJlvRpryNV1aiy3oEP4M273I_pLldEcRho5wq17Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13–2402.

Voter Intimidation by Poll Workers

The Brennan Center and All Voting is Local published a detailed resource on the rules and constraints for Arizona poll workers here.

Intimidation by Poll Watchers

In addition to Arizona’s voter intimidation laws detailed above, the state places limits on who may serve as poll watchers and what they may do:footnote18_RCh90JznkOMH5x17OrLNnKGjHMwqrfLwdWc6gSJ6d-I_dA6neBTHxi4n18Note that watchers in Arizona are referred to as “challengers” in state statute, and “observers” in Department of State guidance. 

Election officials may remove from a polling place any watcher who interferes with the election process.footnote24_gVTFis5IFGwMKf-0DIbyyU7s0A5i09QQLRe2mZs920_zr82Rqsz94UG24Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, 139.

The Brennan Center and All Voting Is Local published a detailed resource on the rules and constraints on Arizona poll watchers here.

State and Local Law Enforcement

Inspectors or marshals may contact law enforcement to preserve order or remove disruptive persons from polling places; however, they must use sound judgment before doing so.footnote25_Cx0ps3uTyJutoXHba9HNXDbFgQE202lUTyrujJvHVo_otgpoxm554xM25Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, 182.

Guns at Polling Places

Private citizens are prohibited from bringing weapons into polling places or within 75 feet of a polling place, even if the voter is licensed to carry such weapons.footnote26_EDycYfAHOQGiRY26mGiPVyM2RGPfJ8JXWQHfKhhrGo_wcM8QtD5CQfE26Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13–3102(A)(11).Military and on-duty peace officers acting in performance of their official duties are excepted.footnote27_ZUpLHAIFxH5MUWOrcWxEQhCVWJ-OpHeUlzl61Ci4hE_hSYz8MK2KHWb27Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13–3102(C).Openly carrying a firearm outside the 75-foot limit may constitute intimidation.footnote28_Cx0ps3uTyJutoXHba9HNXDbFgQE202lUTyrujJvHVo_bUzJZRlkBWvc28Arizona Department of State, State of Arizona 2023 Election Procedures Manual, 182.Therefore, private citizen possession of a firearm in or around a polling place should be treated as intimidation.

Even at locations where firearms are not expressly prohibited, firearm carry may constitute unlawful intimidation. Such conduct may consist of carrying a visible firearm near a polling location or at a drop box or vote-counting site, displaying a concealed firearm during a discussion or argument with a voter or election worker, or approaching a voter or election worker while displaying a firearm.

Door-to-Door Intimidation

Arizona and federal law prohibit canvassing efforts that are used to intimidate voters.footnote29_3OU4ewVT8jZbrFZ8Q6cDLBDko0aJu83brUNuzLuSA_dOtirSlnMsVE2918 U.S.C. §§ 594, 241; Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16–1013.Moreover, in response to a 2021 proposal in Arizona to conduct a door-to-door canvass of voters to investigate voter eligibility, the Department of Justice sent a letter to the Arizona senate specifically warning that such a system may constitute unlawful voter intimidation under federal law. Any voter who receives a visit from a privately organized canvassing group does not have to answer any questions and should report any incidents of intimidation to their local officials.

End Notes