On November 16, 2021, individual voters and Texas-based advocacy groups filed a federal lawsuit in the Western District of Texas challenging Texas’s congressional, state house, and state senate maps for violating the U.S. Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Plaintiffs include Fair Maps Texas Action Committee (a coalition consisting of League of Women Voters of Texas, Clean Elections Texas, Texans Against Gerrymandering, Our Vote Texas, ACLU of Texas, National Council of Jewish Women-Greater Dallas Section, and Common Cause Texas), OCA-Greater Houston, the North Texas Chapter of the Asian Pacific Islander Americans Public Affairs Association, Emgage, and a group of Black, Latino, and Asian voters. Plaintiffs are represented by the Brennan Center, the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the ACLU of Texas.
In the suit, plaintiffs allege that Texas’s new congressional and legislative maps deny voters of color an equal opportunity to elect their preferred candidates, and that Texas legislators used race as a predominant factor and discriminated against voters of color.
The lawsuit focuses on dynamic, diversifying communities across the state, particularly those in Fort Bend County (outside of Houston), in Bell County (near Fort Hood), and in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. In these areas, fast-growing Latino, Black, and Asian voters were “cracked” across multiple districts or, conversely, unnecessarily “packed” into a small number of overwhelmingly minority districts. Both discriminatory tactics produce the same result: districts that fail to give fair representation to communities of color that accounted for 95 percent of Texas’ population growth last decade.
The behavior being challenged in the suit is a continuation of Texas’ long and uninterrupted legacy of discriminatory redistricting, with federal courts invalidating districts in Texas for discriminating against nonwhite voters every redistricting cycle for the last five decades. Though Republican legislators claimed they drew their maps on a “race-blind” basis, the subsequent maps include many examples of discriminatory tactics. In Fort Bend County, for example, the new congressional map cracks the center of a growing Asian population between three districts, diluting the community’s voting power. In another instance, the house map prevents the city of Killeen’s Latino and Black voters from electing their preferred candidates by dividing the city between two districts. Overall, the maps simply do not reflect the fact that no ethnic or racial group makes up a majority of the population. Even though 95 percent of Texas’s population growth in the last decade came from people of color, two-thirds of the enacted senate districts, and both new congressional districts have majority-white populations among eligible voters.
The case has been consolidated with eight others: LULAC v. Abbott, Escobar v. Abbott, Fischer v. Abbott, United States v. Texas, Texas State Conference of the NAACP v. Abbott, Brooks v. Abbott, MALC v. Texas, and Abuabara v. Scott. The trial was scheduled to begin on September 28, 2022, however because of ongoing discovery disputes the three-judge panel has postponed it to a later date that has yet to be determined.
Fair Maps Texas Documents
- Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (November 16, 2021)
- Order Appointing Three-Judge Panel (November 18, 2021)
- Order Consolidating Case with LULAC v. Abbott (November 19, 2021)
- Joint Proposed Agenda for Status Conference (December 2, 2021)
- Scheduling Order (December 17, 2021)
- Order Amending Scheduling Order (December 27, 2021)
- Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (February 5, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (February 18, 2022)
- Defendants’ Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint (February 25, 2022)
- Order Modifying Schedule Order (April 7, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Designation of Expert Witnesses (May 20, 2022)
- Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (May 23, 2022)
- Order Modifying Scheduling Order (June 9, 2022)
- Order Consolidating Cases (June 27, 2022)
- Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (July 1, 2022)
- Defendants’ Designation of Expert Witnesses (July 18, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents (July 21, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (July 22, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (July 26, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Designation of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses (July 27, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (August 3, 2022)
- Defendants’ Reply Supporting Motion to Dismiss (August 8, 2022)
- Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Order Compelling Defendants to Produce Documents (August 17, 2022)
- Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (August 17, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Joint Advisory Regarding Aug. 22 Court Order (August 26, 2022)
- Order Delaying Discovery and Trial (August 30, 2022)
- Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Production of Documents (September 2, 2022)
- Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (September 15, 2022)
- Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Case (September 28, 2022)
- Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (October 12, 2022)
- Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery to Seek Specific Documents (October 17, 2022)
- Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery (October 24, 2022)
- Plaintiff’s Reply Supporting Their Motion to Reopen Discovery (November 1, 2022)
- Orders Requiring Plaintiffs to Produce Previously Withheld Documents (November 17, 2022)
- Order Clarifying Documents to be Produced (November 23, 2022)
- Order Setting Trial Schedule (December 5, 2022)
- Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (June 16, 2023)
- Private Plaintiffs’ Joinder to the United States Response to Motion for Briefing Schedule (July 27, 2023)
- Private Plaintiffs’ Second Supplemental Brief regarding the Legislative Privilege (August 11, 2023)
- Order for Parties to File a Joint Status Report (August 21, 2023)
- Status Report Regarding Pending Disputes (August 28, 2023)
- Private Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Second Supplemental Brief regarding the Legislative Privilege (September 22, 2023)